February 19, 2013 – 10:30 pm
I’m not reviewing “Cougar Town” this week over at The A.V. Club because it’s “Second Opinions” time there. Basically, a whole buncha writers are swapping a whole buncha shows. I’ll still be covering “Spartacus” because I’m pretty sure I’m the only one over there that watches it, and I’m covering “House Of Cards” as per usual. But since I enjoy writing about “Cougar Town”, and because I’ve been down on the show over the past few weeks, I wanted to write a few words about the show anyway this week, since “Flirting With Time” is the best episode since the third installment this season, “Between Two Worlds”.
Read More »
February 8, 2013 – 12:06 am
There’s something to be said about a show that absolutely knows what it is, yet consistently surprises itself along the way.
There’s something to be said about a show that doesn’t just settle for being a soap opera, but barrels headlong into the world of opera itself.
There’s something to be said about a show that lures the audience in and then bitchslaps them left and right until there’s almost no way for the viewer to orientate himself or herself.
Thus goes “Scandal” at this point, a show I’ve written about off and on since it started but never had much in the way of a consistent gig exploring the ins and outs of its machinations. Oddly enough, the time at which I did cover it (the first four episode of Season 2) might have been the weakest stretch, a time in which it was transforming from a moderately watchable caterpillar into a batshit butterfly. The end of that fourth episode introduced the conspiracy that has dominated the show’s narrative ever since. But at the time, I thought it an unnecessary contrivance.
So yea, point to Shonda Rhimes in this round.
Read More »
February 5, 2013 – 11:00 pm
There’s little that I can add to the thousands upon thousands of words written about “Justified” each week than to simply say that’s this fourth season has found the program as once again the most pleasurable hours on television. The word “pleasurable” might sound odd, considering the amount of tension, violence, and duplicity on display. But “Justified” is a show that appeals less to the brain and more to the senses. There’s an intelligence at work, to be sure, at all times. But Graham Yost and company never let that get in the way of a show that appeals to sight, sound, smell, touch, and taste.
Only the first two senses are transmitted through the television during a given episode, but I’ll be damned if “Justified” doesn’t affect the illusion of the other three. Time spent in Harlan County and the surrounding areas is all-encompassing, with a world so lived-in by this point that an audience member simply loses oneself in the show’s ambience. It’s not necessarily a world in which one might want to literally spend time, but it’s one I enjoy bathing in on a weekly basis from the comfort of my couch.
Part of the immense charms of tonight’s fifth episode, “Kin”, comes not from the expanse in the cultural anthropology posing as noir Western that is the show. Having the “hill people” added to the overall population of the show was fun, to be sure. But even more fun was the use of what seems like an absolutely ginormous cast of supporting characters, each of whom are easily identifiable in terms of motivation, affiliation, and relation to one another. This isn’t about carefully laying out a series of introductions to new people so they will all tumble over nicely in domino fashion in the penultimate episode. Rather, the season-long mystery into the disappearance Drew Thompson of has allowed “Justified” to careen through its rogue’s gallery like a pinball that keeps bumping into new obstacles at every turn. None of these actors compete for airtime or narrative oxygen: all seem content to play their small bit and make the whole stronger than the individual parts.
By keeping Raylan and Boyd apart until tonight, the show also showed patience that paid off in spades. Putting these two together as often as possible would have been easy to understand (hell, the second season of “Homeland” was predicated on keeping two characters that honestly had no business together in the same shot more often than not), but in keeping these moments more infrequent, it also makes them that much more potent once deployed. There’s no reason to think these two won’t meet again (with Boyd probably getting the upper hand that time around), but neither have any pressing desire to do so. Neither does “Justified”, which keeps marching to the beat of its own drummer and producing a laid-back yet insistent time signature that sets my toes tapping long after each installment has ended.
February 4, 2013 – 8:23 pm
To save its long-term future, television needs to think about going short.
This isn’t a plea to dumb down ideas, shrink budgets, or otherwise harm the medium. But it’s clear that the current model isn’t sustainable for the long-term future of the industry as a whole. This isn’t about whether or not “House Of Cards” is the future of television. Spoiler alert: It’s not, and that assessment has nothing to do with anything that may or may not happen in episodes you’ve yet to bingewatch. Dropping the sum total of what we normally call a “season” is a novel approach, but it’s hardly a gamechanging one for whatever we’re going to call “television shows” in the semi-near future.
What WILL change things, however, is an approach by those greenlighting the production of these types of narratives and those who disseminate them in some way, shape, or form to the eyeballs of the world that takes into account not simply the quality of the narrative, but the proper length at which said narrative such unfold. There always will be a place for a show that follows a procedural model and can sustain stories for decades on end without worry of running out of criminals to catch, patients to heal, or a family crisis to handle before dinnertime. What follows here isn’t a rallying cry to abandon those types of shows. Nor does this stem from a desire to stop any attempt to unleash a complex, multifaceted story that necessitates years in the telling of it.
However, I would say that those are almost the only two models currently in play, and that’s hurting the medium as a whole.
Read More »
January 7, 2013 – 6:39 pm
Certain shows do certain things well. When it comes to FX’s “Justified”, making its long-overdue return to television on January 8th, the thing that comes to mind most often while watching it is the sense of place that the show evokes better than almost any other on the small screen. The characters don’t simply live in Harlan. They are infused by it, with the soil creeping up into their pores, their minds, and their hearts.
Season 3 saw an expansion of the ostensibly small town that suggested a “Game Of Thrones”-esque opening sequence might be the only way to truly grasp its scope. (And now that I’ve said that, that’s pretty much all I want to see at the start of the next episode.) The introduction of Noble’s Holler felt like “Justified” unearthing a large chunk of history heretofore unexplored on the show, implying that there were plenty of other avenues for the program to explore both new, nefarious forms of crime, but also countless veins of history for the show to mine.
Read More »
January 6, 2013 – 12:04 pm
Back in November, in the wake of “Homeland”’s incredible episode “New Car Smell”, I interviewed several showrunners on the current climate of supersmart TV fans and how they were influencing modern TV storytelling. You can read that piece over at The Daily Beast, where Shawn Ryan (“The Shield”, “Terriers”, “Last Resort”), Steven DeKnight (“Spartacus”), and Bill Lawrence (“Spin City”, “Scrubs”, “Cougar Town”) all offered up provocative thoughts about how writers combat audiences’ deep understanding of how TV currently works and the desire to constantly surprise said audience.
But while many quotes from those interviews made the Daily Beast piece, there were many more than ended up on the cutting room floor. In anticipation of the return of “Cougar Town” this Tuesday, I thought I’d publish more of my interview with Bill Lawrence. (As I did last year, I’ll be covering the show on a weekly basis over at The A.V. Club.) Those looking for spoilers/teasers about this upcoming fourth season will find little below to slake that particular thirst. But those looking for deep insight into both the current state of TV as well as its potential future will find a lot to chew on below. As both a fan of television and someone interesting in where it’s going, Lawrence has the perspective of a hardcore fan as well as deep experience inside the medium. We talk at length about the process that goes into constructing an episode of his shows, how that approach has changed over the years, how technology may or may not have changed fandom itself, what shows need to do to stay alive in this saturated market, and what the future may hold for television as a whole.
Read More »
December 18, 2012 – 8:41 pm
Last week, I started my year-end list for the best of television in 2012. I planned on writing up the other half of the list earlier than tonight, but sometimes life gets in the way. Before the list gets revealed on The A.V. Club this week as part of their year-end coverage, I thought I’d finally get around to revealing my Top 10.
More so than last week’s ten, I feel pretty strongly about the demarcation of these shows. On any given day, my 20 through 11 shows might have shifted around, some even semi-significantly? Here, everything is locked into place in relationship to one another. If you have the urge to get mad at what follows, I’d suggest taking a deep breath and reading some words of wisdom from Linda Holmes about lists such as this.
We good? Good. Read More »
December 11, 2012 – 11:01 pm
First things first: I kind of hate year-end lists.
Criticism is a subjective medium on the best of days, where the skill comes not from having a God’s eye view of what’s actually “good” or “bad” so much as the ability to identify and articulate points of views derived from a understanding and appreciation of a certain medium. That means that all opinions aren’t equal, but they are all more or less opinions all the same. This gets readers into fits all the time. After all, one need only write one positive review in order to be accepted into a certain fold, but no amount of exposure that yields a negative response is never enough to justify that opposing viewpoint.
Read More »
December 7, 2012 – 11:30 pm
With the show back on for three weeks in December, I check in over at HitFix on the latest ep.
Enjoy!
December 2, 2012 – 7:18 pm
A few weeks back, I decided to have a contest for my birthday. The idea was to unleash the creativity of those that follow me on Twitter to generate some imagery for me and a $50 Amazon gift card for the winner.
As is the norm these days, I got massively piled under my day-to-day work, so I’ve been slow in revealing who that winner is. But I thought I’d post all the entries so those that entered would get recognition.
Read More »